Wednesday 30 April 2014

Raas Leela of Kaanha



In Raas-leela Shree Krishna, Atmaram, gave chance for utmost anand by taking command of Gopis mind, soul, life, heart and all the senses and towards the midst of Maharaas.  Gopis became transgressed into satwik pride. And the  Lord left from the Maharaas and Gopis became confused, unhappy and helpless.

Shree Krishna when speaking to Gopis said:

I cannot heed or sustain the pride (mada) of an ignorant man/woman, so how can I sustain the pride of educated person and my bhakta. I will come on earth as Krishna to do damana of the mada. Where there is mada and Moha (material infatuation), I Krishna will not reside in that environment. Because of this valence, I am called Mada Na Mohan, that is No Mada and no Moha, hence, my name is Madanamohan

The reason for God to disappear during Maharaas:

In Raas-leela, when gopis had satwik pride, Shree Krishna decided to vanish. In Maharaas, Krishna bestowed two elements, namely Prashman (pure) and Prasanna (pleasing). Prashman was used by Shree Hari to conquer mada and Prasanna was used to entice Gopis eyes and heart so they could see the Purna Purshottam in Maharaas. When pride seeped in Gopis, then Prashman and Prasanna left gopis and hence, Shree Gokulchandrama vanished.

The second reason was to explain all bhaktas that when a person has been granted the utmost position in Bhakti Marg, that person cannot exude pride and get away with it. As pride can destroy the dasa bhava. Even at this stage one has to maintain the position as a full surrender to Lord and Lord is Master and Das is the servant. So Das criteria is foremost humbleness to be at a total surrender. When this position tilts, Krishna moves away. This position was altered by Gopis pride and Krishna  disappeared.
Now the third reason why Shree Krishna disappeared. Krishna wanted Gopis to experience Viprayog raas with Sayog raas, so He disappeared. Sayog raas is the entity of being close with Thakorji and Viprayog is opposite of Sayog being separated from Him, but in this state one really misses Lord and a realization dawns on the victim of this yoga that he/she cannot live without Lord. This can be demonstrated when you are hungry, then eating becomes pleasure, drinking water becomes a happiness when one fulfills one’s quench. So food and water tastes sweater when you are hungry and quench takes that mode. Similarly, that hunger and quench for Krishna is created in Viprayog raas, the lovers meet and that is known as milan and when separated from each other it is known as Virah. So milan is Sayog raas and Virah is Viprayog raas. Love becomes intense in Virah, as the realization of milan and its beautiful permutation of love and closeness becomes that apparent. So in Virah, one will enjoy the memories of Milan. Shree Krishna decided to enhance the Sayog raas within Viprayog raas, so he disappeared.
The items which can be easily acquired becomes of no value or lesser when compared to the item which was very difficult or needed lots of effort to acquire. This is the law which was applied by Lord in Maharaas. He wanted to demonstrate that Lord is something which cannot be acquired so easily and if after hard work and acquisition in acquiring Him, one will appreciate Shree Krishna more. Taking this concept and also Shyamsunder likes hide and seek games, decided to disappear from Raas.
Shyamsunder had seen the happiness and laughter on the face of Gopis in Maharaas, so he wanted to play an opposite leela (Virudhabhas Leela). In this leela he wanted to make gopis cry. The tears then washes one’s mind and cleanses one’s heart.  These tears will then clear that pride which so ungratefully separated Krishna from them, in Maharaas.
This satwik pride is a positive pride. It is alokik, that is non materialistic pride that depicts a total devotional pride towards Krishna. As this pride is positive, it entails closeness and also entails a degree of punishment which in turn enhances closeness and a better position than previous one.

For instance, in Maharaas we saw gopis who did take pride into the stride and Krishna vanished from the Raas-leela. Here in normal instances, in alokik environment, one does not get this pride, but it was Lord Himself who fused the pride into gopis so he could take the gopis to next stage to enhance the pleasure gained in Maharaas. The pride always takes one to “Viprayog” sukh, which is mode in which one becomes agitated because one is away from the loved one, but, sweetly contempt’s into memory lane and walks on the plane of happy days. This Viprayog makes one to understand the reality of sanyog sukh, and this understanding takes person into the planes of repentance, which then slowly pushes the situation in which person comes back to it previous happiness, but this time into better position, that is the happiness is increased into two folds.

Gopis after satwik pride, became desperate as Lord Krishna vanished; this Viprayog then instigated birth of Gopi Geet.  The Gopi-Geet is the landmark which took the Gopis to the peak of pleasure and Maharaas was continued, this raas was enhanced into top notch of all the permutation of bhakti
[Courtesy Google]

Gopis

In Sanskrit, Gopi word is coined as two syllables. “Go” means the Upanishads, meaning scriptures. Upanishads are the ras of God, the ras that is form of God himself. You need to be a woman to get that close to God, to enjoy this kind of ras (nectar).

Then the second syllable is “pi”. This “pi” pronounce as “pea”, that means to drink. Since  Gopis are Shruti rupa, Veda rupa, Rushi rupa and Deva rupa, they were very  knowledgeable and were able to understand the form of Krishna described in Upanishads.  They have taken the nectar of Shree Krishna and this way the ras  (nectar) was taken into their hearts. The only way to drink this ras.

Sri Ramakrishna has said that the devotion of the gopis was the devotion of love, constant unmixed and unflinching. They loved Krishna more than anyone else and proved as the examples of the bhakthiyoga which Krishna  was going to preach in the battlefield in his discourse of the Bhagavad Gita, ‘mayyeva mana Adhathsva mayi buddhim nivesaya,’ by thinking of him alone all the time. Swami Vivekananda said that raasa leela is the acme of the religion of love, to which individuality vanishes and there is communion.

Even Parikshit  raised the doubt that how could these women who thought about Krishna only as their lover attain the divine communion with him. Suka pointed out that the single pointed concentration on the Lord in whatever capacity is enough to attain Him.  Krishna himself clarifies this doubt in Srimad Bhagavatham  by saying that the desire of those, who approach him to satisfy the baser instincts, become like roasted seeds which never shoot up again,(Bh.10-22-28) In the 11th skandha Krishna remarks that the gopis attained that state which even the yogis find difficult to reach by their sheer love.(Bh.11-12-13). Swami Vivekananda has said that to understand the love of gopis it is first essential to make yourself pure as it could not be understood with impure minds. It is to be remembered that the one who told the story was Suka who was a self-realised  master and those who gathered to hear him were the sages who have renounced the world.

Lord Krishna tells Uddhava about  Gopis-

tha navidhan mayyanushangabaddhadhiyah, svamathmanam adhasthathedham yatha samadhou munayo abdhithoye, nadhyah pravishta iva namarupe (Bh.11.12)

With their thoughts firmly fixed on Me they were not aware of their body or what was far or near, just like sages in samadhi or the rivers losing their name and form on merging with the sea.

Gopis are Guru of all vaishavas, jnani, yogi & bhaktas.  Make Gopi your Guru to attain Him.

[courtesy Google]

Cries of Gopis

"O beloved! please reveal Yourself and see how your sweethearts, who have centered their life around you, are longing for you... You have saved us time and again from death through poisonous water, from the clutches of demon disguised as a snake and in the form of a calf, from showers and storm, from strokes of lightning, from all sort of menaces... We believe that You are not merely son of a cowherd woman but essence of all embodied souls... You have manifested for the protection of the universe... O beloved, Our mind grows uneasy thinking about your lotus-feet getting pricked with blades of grass and sprouts when You go out pasturing the cattle... Our minds are infatuated and we are longing to be one with You. Please appear before us

Bhagwat Purana


Bhagavat Purana (also known as Srimad Bhagavata, Bhagavatam or Bhagwat) is the most popular and widely circulated of all the Puranas. The word 'Purana' means 'narrative of olden times'. After the four vedas, the Puranas form the most sacred of the texts for devout Hindus. The highest philosophy found in Vedas and Upanishads was difficult for commoners to understand. Hence Puranas, which were recited at the time of sacrifices became popular. With the passage of time, Puranas involving different deities manifested: Brahma, Padma, Vishnu, Siva, Garuda, Narada, Bhagavata, Agni, Skanda, Bhavishya, Brahmavaivarta, Markandeya, Vamana, Varaha, Matsya, Kurma and Brahmanda - a total of eighteen.

Dear to devotees of Lord Vishnu, Bhagavat Purana consists of eighteen thousand slokas, distributed amongst 332 chapters and divided into twelve cantos (skandhas). It is named Bhagavata from its being dedicated to the glorification of Lord Vishnu, a premier Hindu deity. Though originally written in Sanskrit, Bhagavat has been explored and translated in major vernacular languages of India. Bhagavat, an epic philosophical and literary classic, holds a prominent position in India’s voluminous written wisdom. Bhagavat exercises a more direct and powerful influence upon the opinions and feelings of the people than perhaps any other of the Puranas.

Bhagavat is considered essence of Hindu mythology like Geeta being considered as essence of Upanishads. Bhagavat deals mainly with innumerable exploits of Krishna, an avatar or incarnation of Vishnu and stresses on devotion, as way to salvation (mukti). Sage Vyas, author of many great scriptures like Mahabharat and Vedas, compiled it . The 18,000-verse treatise centers on the science of God and devotion to Him, and includes biographies of great devotees who followed the path of Bhakti and attained moksha.

From academic point of view, Bhagavata Purana is a narration of a conversation between King Parikshit and Sage Sukdev (Shukadeva). King Parīkshit was cursed to die in seven days by a Brahmin, so he decided to spent final days of his life in gaining knowledge about the goal of life relegating his stately duties. As he prepares for his impending death, Shukadeva, who has been searching for a suitable disciple to whom he might impart his great knowledge, approaches the king and agrees to teach him. Their conversation goes on uninterrupted for seven days, during which the king does not eat, drink or sleep. During this time the sage explains that the ultimate aim of life lies in knowing the supreme absolute truth.

The most popular and characteristic part of Bhagavat is the tenth canto, which describes the life and works of Sri Krishna. The Bhagavata Purana depicts Krishna not as a Jagad-Guru (a teacher) as in the Bhagavad-Gita, but as a heroic lad brought up by cowherd parent, Nand and Yashoda, in a small village situated on the banks of Yamuna River. Young Krishna's childhood plays and acts of bravery in protecting villagers from demons steals the hearts of the cowherd girls (Gopis'). In his unique enchanting way, Krishna lifts Gopis to a higher state as a result of intense devotion. However, when Krishna leaves for Mathura on a mission, Gopis' love turns into grief. Their intense longing is presented as a model of extreme devotion to the Supreme Lord. In a way, Bhagavat paved way to various schools of Bhakti Movement.

Known as 'the ripe fruit of the tree of Vedic literature', Srimad-Bhagavatam is the most complete and authoritative exposition of Vedic knowledge. It covers everything from the nature of the self to the origin of the universe, and touches upon all fields of knowledge. It raises and answers fundamental questions like what is life, what is a human being's role in life, what is meant by cycle of birth and death, what is the relation between God and man, what are ways of propitiating God etc. Bhagavata also adds fifth element of devotion (or divine service) besides well-known four aspects of life i.e. dharma (morality), artha (acquiring wealth), kama (pleasure) and moksha (liberation or salvation). Narrated in story-form its style is simple, lyrical and picturesque.

The impact of Bhagavata on Indian life over ages cannot be measured easily. It has served as the inspiration for countless works of literature, song, drama, painting, sculpture, folk-theatres and crafts. Dealing with exploits of Lord Krishna from childhood to Mahabharata battle, anecdotes and stories figure in one form or other in Vaishnava temple sculptures. Kaliya mardana, Gopika Vastra-harana, Gajendra-moksha, Govardhan-dharan are only few events which have kindled imagination of artistes and craftsmen through ages. All the important dance schools, Bharatanatyam, Kathak, Kathakkali, Odissi and Manipuri have themes from Bhagavata.
[photo content courtesy Google]

Morning

In the morning I bathe my intellect in the stupendous and cosmogonal philosophy of the Bhagvat-Geeta, since whose composition years of the gods have elapsed, and in comparison with which our modern world and its literature seem puny and trivial...
- Henry David Thoreau -

Tuesday 29 April 2014

The cry of the $ou£


The worst type of crying is the silent one.The one when everyone is asleep. The one where you feel it in your throat, and your eyes become blurry from the tears. The one where you just want to scream. The one where you have to hold your breath and grab your stomach to keep quiet. The one where you can't breathe anymore. The one that you realize that the person that meant the most to you, is gone!







Monday 28 April 2014

SRI ISOPANISAD LECTURES By His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

LECTURE 11

Śrī Īśopaniṣad, Mantra 5
Los Angeles, May 7, 1970

Prabhupāda: Govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi **. Where is Hayagrīva prabhu? Oh, that's all right. So you have to construct a temple there like this.
Hayagrīva: By August, Prabhupāda.
Prabhupāda: Eh?
Hayagrīva: By August, Prabhupāda.
Prabhupāda: Thank you. So you like this? This chandelier? Śrī gurave prāṇa sadece goura sampad setuce (?). This is, this is a song by Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura. He says that one who has dedicated his life for Lord Caitanya, he sees everything belongs to Lord Caitanya. Hare Kṛṣṇa. Now mantra. (devotees chant Īśopaniṣad, Mantra 5) Thank you. "The Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He is far away, but he is very near as well. He is within everything and again He is outside of everything." This is the process of understanding Kṛṣṇa consciousness. He walks and does not walk. Just like crude example I give you, that the sun and, at noontime, it is on your head and somebody walking eastern side or western side, he also sees the sun is also walking with him. Long ago, about forty years ago, when I was householder, my second son, he was four years old. He was walking with me, and he said, "Oh, father, why the moon is coming with us?" This is very intelligent. Yes. So similarly, if a material object can walk so swift... You have seen. You are going on aeroplane or train, you'll see the moon or sun is going with you. So how it is not possible that Kṛṣṇa cannot walk? Although He's situated... But you ask your friend, "Where is the sun? Where is the moon?" He'll say, "Oh, it is on my head." Similarly, goloka eva nivasaty akhilātma-bhūtaḥ [Bs. 5.37]. Kṛṣṇa, although He is in Vṛndāvana, Goloka Vṛndāvana, enjoying pastimes with the associates, He is everywhere, according to the position, shape, form, activities. Everywhere. Therefore it is said here that Supreme Lord walks and does not walk. He does not go from His abode. He is fully enjoying. But at the same time, everywhere He is. Everywhere walking. Just like we offer foodstuff. So do not think that Kṛṣṇa is not accepting. Kṛṣṇa is accepting, because He can spread His hand immediately if you offer something with devotion. Tayā bhakty-upahṛtam aśnāmi. Kṛṣṇa says, "Anyone offering Me, offering Me something with faith and love, I eat." People may ask, "Oh, Kṛṣṇa is far away, in Goloka Vṛndāvana. How He eats? How He takes?" Oh, that is God. Yes, He eats. Yes, He takes. He walks; He does not walk. Immediately comes. But you must have the qualification to call Him. If you are actually a devotee, immediately Kṛṣṇa is present. Just like Hiraṇyakaśipu challenged devotee Prahlāda, "Where is your God? Do you think...?" The Prahlāda was looking to the column. "Oh, do you think your God is here? All right." He immediately broke. "Ahh!" Kṛṣṇa came. That is Kṛṣṇa.
So this is explained here. This is Vedic mantra. This is the proof, Veda mantra. Why we are attached to Veda mantra? Veda mantra is the proof of everything. Whatever is said in the Vedas, that is fact. Unless you take some axiomatic truth in that way, you cannot make progress. Just like in geometry there are so many axiomatic truths, we have to accept it. "A point has no length, no breadth." "Things equal to the same thing are equal to one another." These are axiomatic truths. Similarly the Vedas, they are truth. We have to accept. Just like I've given example in my book: The conchshell is the bone of an animal. So Vedic injunction is if you touch the bone of an animal, immediately you become impure and you have to take your bath. But here is a bone which is used in the Deity room. But you cannot argue, "Oh, you said that bone is impure. As soon as you touch it, you become impure. And you are putting into the Deity room?" No argument. You have to accept it. This is Veda. You cannot argue. Similarly, spiritual master's order, you have to accept. There is no argument. In this way you can make progress. Sādhu śāstra guru vākya tinete kariyā aikya. If we argue... Na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet. Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet. Things which are inconceivable by you, you cannot argue. Then it will be a failure. You have to accept that axiomatic truth. It is not dogmatic. It is not dogmatic in this sense, because our predecessor ācāryas, they accepted. What you are that you are arguing? So that is the proof. Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ [Cc. Madhya 17.186]. Tarko 'pratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā. If you argue, there is no conclusion. The argument will go on. You put some argument; I put some argument. That is not the process. Śrutayo vibhinnā. Scriptures, in different countries, different circumstances, different scriptures, they're also different. Then tarko 'pratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā nāsau munir yasya mataṁ na bhinnam. And so far philosophical speculation is concerned, one philosopher is putting some theory, another philosopher putting some theory—there is contradiction. And unless you defy another philosopher, you cannot be a famous philosopher. That is the way of philosophical...
Then where, how to get real information? That is stated, that dharmasya tattvaṁ nihitaṁ guhāyām. The secret of religious process is lying in the cave or within the heart. So how to realize it? Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ [Cc. Madhya 17.186]. You have to follow great personalities. Therefore we are trying to follow Lord Kṛṣṇa or Lord Caitanya. That is perfection. You have to take evidences from the Vedas. You have to follow the instruction. The success is sure. That's all.
Thank you very much. Chant Hare Kṛṣṇa. (end)

Love of Radha Krishna

"Why Radha and Krishna's marriage never took place...?"
The love between Krishna and Radha is eternal. Krishna did not marry Radha to show an example to all the lovers of this material world. Even though Krishna loves Radha eternally in his heart, soul, body and mind, he did not marry her. Krishna had a mission, lesson to deliver to the world -The essence of Bhagavad Gita. So, he left his love, Mathura for us. He taught us how to detach ourselves from attachment to pursuit the supreme goal of life (spiritual advancement).

He taught us how to sacrifice love for the sake of others. We obviously see nowadays that lovers - teenagers, adults are separated due to various circumstances, marry someone else without forgetting the one who stays in their hearts. Likewise Krishna did not forget Radha even though he married Rukmani, Satyabhama.

True lovers definetely get united one day in this life or the next life. Krishna and Radha statue erected in temples show us to believe in love and accept their unique love story.

Another view:
Krishna could not marry Radha because she was related to his father and was in a way his aunty. Very few people know this truth.

One more view:
Krishna is soul and Radha is mind. Soul (Krishna) controls the mind (Radha) and after enlightenment they become one. In marriage man and woman would have separate identity and therefore after enlightenment only soul control every action so no new Karma bondage.
[content link wikkianswers]
[photo courtesy Google]

Sunday 27 April 2014

Krishna the Savior

भग़वान कहते है -
तलाश ना कर मुझे
ज़मीन-ओ-आसमान
की गर्दिशों में.....!
अगर तेरे दिल में नहीं हूँ.....
तो कहीं नहीं हूँ मैं.........!!
"Log karte hain koshish jitni mujhe rulane ki,mujhe milti hai taakat aur jyada muskurane ki. Wo samajhte hain main toot kar bikhar jaaungi lekin mujhe yakin hai ki aur jyada nikhar  aaungi.Maine gir gir key bhi apne aap ko kai baar uthaya hai. Mujhe hai poora yakeen mere pyare Kaanha kaa har pal mujh par saaya hai...."
[written by हरी प्रिये]

OSHO on ●NOURISH YOUR BODY, HEART AND SOUL●

[ enlightened mystic Osho’s vision on right diet, one of the three vital things helps awaken the dormant energy in the navel center of a being. Right labour or right exercise is the second point of the three significant ways in the awakening of man’s consciousness and energy. Osho says that in today’s world physical labour is no longer an essential part of our lives but instead it has become a shameful act. Bringing out the essence of “right labour”, Osho says “the more intensely, the more blissfully, the more gratefully a man enters the labor part of his life, the more he will find that his life-energy has started moving down from the brain closer to the navel.” Osho adds that “each person should find out according to himself, according to his body, how much labor he should do to live more healthily and more freshly. The more fresh air there is inside the body, the more blissful each and every breath is, the more vitality a person has to explore the inner.” Read on through Osho’s own words to enlighten yourself on the value of labour…..]

A Western thinker, Albert Camus, has written jokingly, in one of his letters, that a time will come when people will start asking their servants to make love for them. If someone falls in love with somebody, he will appoint a servant to go and make love on his behalf. This can happen some day. We have already started getting everything done by others; love is the only thing which we still do ourselves. We appoint others to pray for us. We employ a priest and tell him to pray on our behalf, to do the rituals on our behalf. We appoint a priest in the temple and tell him to worship on our behalf. Even the things like prayer and worship we are getting done by our servants. So if we are getting our servants to worship for us, it is not unthinkable that some day wise people will tell their servants to make love to their beloved on their behalf. What is the difficulty? And those who will not be able to afford servants to do their job, will feel ashamed that they are so poor that they have to make love themselves.
It is possible someday because there is so much in life which is significant but which we are now getting done by our servants! And we are not at all aware of what we have lost by losing the significant things.
All the strength, all the vitality of life is lost because man's body and man's being have been created for a certain amount of labor -- and now he has been spared from all that work. Right labor is also an essential part in the awakening of man's consciousness and energy.

One morning Abraham Lincoln was polishing his shoes in his house. One of his friends who was visiting him, said, "Lincoln! What are you doing? You polish your own shoes?"
Lincoln said, "You surprise me! Do you polish other people's shoes? I am polishing my own shoes -- do you polish others' shoes?"
The friend said, "No, no, I get my shoes polished by others!"
Lincoln said, "It is even worse to get your shoes polished by others than to polish others' shoes."

What does it mean? It means that we are losing our direct contact with life. Our direct contacts with life are those that come through labor.

In the time of Confucius -- about three thousand years ago -- Confucius once went to visit a village. In a garden he saw an old gardener and his son pulling water out of a well. For the old man the work of drawing water out of a well was very difficult even with the help of his son. And the old man was very old.
Confucius wondered if this old man did not know that bulls and horses were now being used to draw water out of the well. He was drawing it himself. He was using such old methods!
So Confucius went to the old man and said, "My friend! Don't you know that there has been a new invention? People are drawing water out of wells with the help of horses and bulls. Why are you doing it yourself?"
The old man said, "Speak softly, speak softly! For me, it does not matter what you say but I am afraid my young son may hear you."
Confucius asked, "What do you mean?"
The old man replied, "I know about these inventions, but all inventions like this take man away from labor. I do not want my son to become disconnected because the day he becomes disconnected from labor, he will be disconnected from life itself."

Life and labor are synonymous. Life and labor have the same meaning. But slowly, slowly we have started calling those people who do not have to do physical exertion, fortunate, and those who have to do physical exertion, unfortunate. And in a way it has become so, because in a way many people have dropped doing labor so some people have to do too much labor. Too much labor kills one. Too little labor also kills one. Hence I said "Right labor. Proper distribution of physical labor." Each person should do some physical labor. The more intensely, the more blissfully, the more gratefully a man enters the labor part of his life, the more he will find that his life-energy has started moving down from the brain closer to the navel. For labor neither the brain nor the heart is needed. The energy for labor is derived directly from the navel. This is its source.
Along with the right diet a little physical labor is very essential. And it is not that it should be in the interest of others -- that if you serve the poor, it benefits the poor; if you go to a village and do farming, it benefits the farmers; if you are doing some labor, you are doing a great social service. These are all false things. It is for your own sake, not for anyone else's sake. It is not concerned with benefiting anybody else. Someone else may benefit by it, but primarily it is for your own good.

When Churchill retired, one of my friends went to see him at his house. In his old age, Churchill was digging and planting some plants in his garden. My friend asked him some questions about politics. Churchill said, "Drop it! Now it is over. Now if you want to ask me something, you can ask me about two things. You can ask me about the Bible, because I read it at home, and you can ask me about gardening because I do it here in the garden. Now I have no concern about politics. That race is over. Now I am doing labor and prayer."
When my friend returned he said to me, "I do not understand what kind of man Churchill is. I thought he would give me some answers. But he said he was doing labor and prayer."

I told him, "Saying labor and prayer is a repetition. Labor and prayer mean the same, they are synonymous. And the day that labor becomes prayer and prayer becomes labor is the day that right labor is attained."
A little labor is very essential but we have not paid any attention to it. Not even the traditional sannyasins of India paid any attention to labor -- they refrained from doing it. There was no question of their doing it. They simply moved in another direction. Rich people stopped laboring because they had money and they could pay for it and sannyasins stopped because they had nothing to do with the world. They neither had to create anything, nor did they have to earn money, so what did they need labor for? The result was that two respected classes of society moved away from labor. So those in whose hands labor remained, slowly, slowly became disrespected.
For a seeker labor has great significance and usefulness -- not because you will produce something from it but because the more you are involved in some kind of labor, the more your consciousness will start becoming centered. It will start coming downwards from the brain. It is not necessary that the labor has to be productive. It can be non-productive also, it can be a simple exercise. But some labor is very essential for the agility of the body, complete alertness of the mind, and total awakening of the being. This is the second part.
There can be a mistake in this part also. Just as one can make a mistake with one's diet -- either one eats too little or one eats too much -- so a mistake can happen here also. Either one does not do labour at all or one does too much. Wrestlers do too much labor. They are in a sick state. A wrestler is not a healthy person. A wrestler is putting too much of a burden on the body -- he is raping the body. If the body is raped, then some parts of the body, some muscles, can be developed more. But no wrestler lives long! No wrestler dies in a healthy state. Do you know this? All wrestlers -- whether he is a Gama, or a Sandow, or anybody else with a great body, even the greatest in the world -- die unhealthy. They die earlier and they die of violent diseases. Raping the body can swell the muscles and make the body worth looking at, worth exhibiting, but there is a great difference between exhibition and life. There is a great difference between living, being healthy and being an exhibitionist.
Each person should find out according to himself, according to his body, how much labor he should do to live more healthily and more freshly. The more fresh air there is inside the body, the more blissful each and every breath is, the more vitality a person has to explore the inner. Simonbel, a French philosopher, has written a very wonderful thing in her autobiography. She said, "I was always sick until the age of thirty. I was unhealthy and I had many headaches. But it was only at the age of forty that I realized that until the age of thirty I was an atheist. I became healthy when I became a theist. Only later did I see that my being sick and unhealthy was related to my atheism."
A person who is sick and unhealthy cannot be full of gratitude towards existence. There can be no thankfulness in him towards existence. There is only anger. It is impossible for such a person to accept something towards which he is full of anger. He simply rejects it. If one's life does not attain a certain balance of health through right labor and right exercise, then it is natural that one will have some negativity, a resistance, an anger towards life.
Right labor is an essential rung on the ladder to ultimate theism.
[photo courtesy Google]
[Osho - The Inner Journey ]

Osho speaks...°Individuality°

“Being” in human seem to have been lost its meaning in the modern sense of the term. Rather it is “doing” that can be related to the human of today. The individual or individuality has been replaced by personality, a false projection borrowed from others. Osho has beautifully brought out the meaning of individuality as one’s own that cannot be borrowed or copied. Osho says “When a person takes upon himself the personality of someone else, it is an imitation, and he ceases to be original. His authentic originality is lost.” It is the biggest stealing, says Osho, to follow others, by ignoring the “one” who is within. Then the authentic self is no longer there. It becomes a life of falsehood.“Life is a network of interconnected relationships. An individual is required to be interrelated. Even an interrelationship is a relationship between two individuals. But two individuals are necessary for a relationship to establish. So life when seen from outside is interrelated; but along with it life is also interrelated from within. If that individual is not there, all the interrelationships become false. Love is a relationship but the individuality of the lover is most necessary, and if that individuality is a borrowed one, it is not an individuality. Individuality is always one's own, it cannot be borrowed. Otherwise it is a deception. That borrowed one is a put on face to show others. Under that face, there is nobody. It has no individuality, neither of life-zest, or originality. What we ordinarily call an individual is, in fact, not an individual but a personality. That what we ordinarily call an individual is not original, but it is a collection of clothes which are put on. It is like an onion. If someone goes on removing the layers of an onion, it appears he will get the onion after each layer. But he gets only layers and never the onion. Similarly we are like a bundle in which all borrowed things have been collected. No matter how deep we go in this borrowed individuality we shall get nothing at the end. If there is no soul, no originality, the whole life becomes a false thing.The biggest stealing in life is copying or, following. If an individual is only interested in becoming like someone else, he becomes a thief in the real sense of the term. When a person takes upon himself the personality of someone else, it is an imitation, and he ceases to be original. His authentic originality is lost. This does not mean that we should not accept ideas coming from others or stop relating with others. We should certainly be connected with others, but we should preserve our individuality -- the 'self'. Currents of thoughts come from others to be accepted.
Accept them by all means, and not only as currents, but you should be yourself -- above and beyond them always. There should stand 'someone' who is aloof and untouched, behind those currents. And he who is so saved from all exchange, is really outside, untouched by exchange. There is a word in the English language called 'Ecstasy'. We have a word called samadhi, Those who translate samadhi into English, use the word 'Ecstasy' for samadhi. 'Ecstasy 'means to stand outside. The meaning of 'Ecstasy' is to remain out and yet being in all the currents of life constantly.
Together with being amidst the worldly life, that which remains within us away from the world, is our originality, this is becoming oneself. If we are totally immersed in life and there is nothing left with us except our outer relationships, then it means we have lost our soul. The meaning of the soul -- self -- is this that there should be everything and yet there is something within, which is untouched and aloof from the outer world. While you are walking on the road, there should be something within you which does not walk. When you are angry, there should be someone within you who sees that anger. When you are eating your food, there should be someone within you who does not eat but who if aware that the food is being eaten. At every moment in this interrelated net of life, if we can save that 'someone' within us, that 'someone' who is saved, who is 'the remaining' is our original self. One who does not own this 'original self', that person has no right to be called a man, a human being. He has no soul, he has lost it.

Very, very few persons among us have a soul in this context. We are simply a collection of layers, a collection of clothes, there is nothing else beneath them. I call this also stealing. It is stealing. To steal someone's wealth is not a big stealing, but to assume someone's personality is a very great stealing. To steal someone's clothes is not a very big theft but to lose ourself in trying to imitate someone else is a very great stealing. I don't say that to take someone's house by force is not stealing. but it is not as big as losing our 'self', being a shadow of someone else.

I have heard a story that some God was displeased with a certain man, and he cursed him. It was a strange curse. That man would lose his shadow from that day onwards. The man laughed when he heard this, and said, 'What use is the shadow to me? When I am saved, how will t he absence of my shadow effect me? I have never cared uptil now whether I have a shadow or not. Are you not mad in cursing me thus? And if you are really displeased, this is no great curse.' Hearing this the God laughed. The God was wiser than that man. The man returned to his town laughing and thinking that the God was crazy. What did he lose by losing his shadow? But when he went to the town he realised the God was not mad because he got into great trouble. Whoever saw that that man had no shadow, was afraid of him and ran away from him. His wife closed the doors against him. His father said, 'Get out of here, don't ever come before me. What are you? Are you a ghost, a spirit?' His friends shut their doors when They saw him. Customers stopped going to his shop.

When he was walking on a road, people called their children indoors. He had no shadow. It became difficult for him to live in the town. Finally the town people who had never heard of a person without a shadow, thought he was very dangerous, and drove him out of the town. Then he realized how much he had lost by losing his shadow. But let us leave this man alone, we are simply shadows. We have lost the soul-self. It is very difficult to assess, to comprehend how much we have lost.

That man only lost his shadow, and ran into such a great difficulty. But we have lost our soul. If a shadow is lost, others will know about it, but if the soul is lost, only the self can know about it, others cannot know about it, because losing of the soul is not an outside incident. So to understand correctly the meaning of non stealing one should constantly ask oneself: 'Have I got anything with me which I can call my own -- my originality; which I had brought with my birth and which I have not learnt in life? Have I got anything which was my own even before the birth?'

If you remember this thing which is with you, and which was with you even before birth, then you can understand that there will remain something with you even after your death. But if you think that that is all that you have got after birth then death will snatch away everything. But if you have got at least something before birth, which you feel is not learnt during;ng life time, nor is it taken or obtained from life, but the nature you were born with, them there is no cause for you to be afraid of death, because death cannot snatch away that which you have not obtained from life.

But we are all afraid of death, not because it is fearful, but because there is nothing in us, what we life, which can be saved -- which can remain with us from death. All that we have obtained from life and others, death will snatch away. It may be fame, wealth, knowledge or personality. That which we have accumulated from others, what we have stolen. Such stealing is not detected in the courts. It is related to that Great Law called religion. It is in the Court of God where this stealing is detected.

Have we got any such thing which we can call 'unlearnt', or not obtained from anyone? If not so, the life which we live is one of stealing. A revolution begins to take place in my life if even once I remember that I have no property which is my own. Therefore, don't think you haven't stolen even a cowrie don't think you haven t stolen anything from someone else's house. What relation has such a theft with religion? Such a theft has relation only with man -- concerned with a special kind of theft which is beyond the grips of law, which cannot be decided by courts, which is beyond the scope of judges. Religion is concerned with that stealing which is related to dignity and honour, which is a theft of individuality, it is a theft of faces; and all of us live with stolen -- borrowed -- faces. The way we live we are not ourselves but someone else.

I had said in this context that nonstealing is the road for achieving one's own individuality, man's soul, and stealing is the highway to losing man's soul. This stealing can manifest itself at the sentimental level, the thought level, the body-physical level. Even our walk our gait, we learn from others. We do not even think in our own way, we learn even to think from others. We do not even feel in our own way, we learn, even how to feel from others.

For example, take the case of a man who reads newspaper in the morning, and talks about some news or the other the whole day with others. It does not even strike him that what he is talking about contains nothing of his own. He reads the Gita, and then goes on repeating it throughout his life, and never looks back to see that there is nothing of his own in what he speaks. All our activities, namely, speaking, thinking, moving here and there, etc. are learnt from others. There cannot be rains of joy in such a life. We cannot find a drop of nectar in such a life. Such a person is like a dry desert, because streams always flow where there is greenery.

One who lives on borrowed springs, lives like a person who considers others' buildings as his own, considers others' eyes as his own, considers others' thoughts as his own and takes himself to be a man of discretion, and who collects bits of information from the scriptures and thinks he has got knowledge. Such a person lives in a delusion and passes his whole life uselessly. We waste it in such a manner. But if this question, 'Am I not a thief' comes before us once, then this question will dog us for ever. And if this question begins to dog us, we shall often see that the act of laughing which I was doing now was learnt by me from the lips of someone else, we shall also see that the tears I was shedding were not true ones, and also my action of bowing to others did not contain the soft sound of my sincerity, and my love-making had not at all love in it, I had learnt it from some drama, and also my love talk with my beloved was simply a repetition of a dialogue heard in a certain film. Leave it alone, if this question comes before a man's life, man will begin to be free from stealing, if not today, tomorrow. His individuality begins to evolve, he begins to laugh in his own way.”
[Osho - The Perennial Path : The Art of Living, # 4, Non Stealing]

Radha Krishna the soul union

One cannot imagine Krishna without Radha. Some people believe that Radha was not a historical person. Whether she was a real person or not, is immaterial. What is important is the fact that the word radha as a metaphor.
Radha as a metaphor is very beautiful and unique. The word carries a deep meaning for the spiritual seekers and devotees. Radha is a reverse dimension of dhara, which means a rivulet that was born out of the ocean.
Search for God or for the truth is the search for our source — the origin!
Osho explains: "In Sanskrit, when the river moves towards the sea, from the origin to the goal, it is called dhara. If the river can move backwards, not towards the sea but towards the origin itself, then it is called radha. Dhara written backwards becomes Radha. Radha simply means one who has started searching for the origin, for the very source from where we are coming. And the only way to reach to the source is to become a lover of existence."
Hindus worship Krishna as the perfect incarnation of God. He absorbs everything in himself - all the contradictions. He is the best lover who plays his flute and dances with thousands of gopis and then shares the highest wisdom of life in the battle ground without getting disturbed. In short, he represents the whole existence. And Radha, his beloved, represents one who is in tremendous love with him and listening to his call, rushes back to him.
There cannot be any rivulet without the sea. There cannot be any Radha without Krishna. The sea can be there without the rivulets, and Krishna can be there without Radha. Yet, this perfect incarnation of God will not be considered totally perfect without Radha. We just cannot imagine the perfection without Radha. Radha does add something very significant to his perfection. He becomes more perfect if that can be said. Presence of Radha with Krishna creates an eternal romance, the maharaas of existence, the inter-play of man-woman love-relationship.
Osho says: "Radha constitutes the whole of Krishna's tenderness and refinement; whatever is delicate and fine in him comes from Radha. She is his song, his dance and all that is feminine in him. Alone Krishna is out and out male, and therefore, there is no meaning in mentioning his name alone. That is why they become united and one, they become Radhakrishna. Both the extremes of life meet and mingle in Radhakrishna. And this adds to Krishna's completeness.

[ Hindustan Times
August 27, 2003
Krishna's feminine sides
Swami Chaitanya Keerti]
[photos courtesy Google]